A
fratricide and a treasure have threaded onto a skewer the fates
of six people from three generations. A goblin is knocking the
tiles down in Avram Tanurkov’s home and the gold is taking
its blood toll from each successive owner. Children pay for
their parents’ wrongdoings and commit their own sins in
turn. And when the old sinner “goes the way of all flesh”
the goblin exclaims: “My, my, what a white soul you’ve
got! I was expecting some greasy one…”
Boyan Papazov’s play Charming my Fleas,
written in six years (1993-1999) assumed a bodily form for the
first time in the National Army Theatre. The polyphony of life,
the arresting confessions, the language, multicoloured like
a Rhodope Mountain rug, the compact characters overflow from
the play into the audience and turn both performers and spectators
into a company of common sympathies. The text’s powerful
impact reminds of The Heaven Forsaken by Ekaterina Tomova. Charming
my Fleas belongs to the same high literary standard although
it was written exclusively for the theatre. The play consists
of six monologues (Tanurko’s piece encloses the child’s
voice of the young brother he killed, but this does not change
its monologue essence). Each of them can exist separately as
a monospectacle without losing its meaning or implications.
Krikor Azaryan’s decision to change their places only
proves this. The director has arranged their talking puzzle
in his own way and this, in my opinion, is for the better. However
he has not managed to translate adequately the mystic tragicomedy
into stage language. Although he is apparently taking advantage
of what the last theatre vogue has on offer (video design Georgi
Bogdanov and Boris Misirkov), the stage version makes a shallow
plunge into the multilayered textual depth. Nikola Toromanov
has divided the stage into two levels: this world and the beyond.
Moreover in the beginning and in the end we see on a screen
the alarm clock of time, gone back to ticking, and the twisted
bodies of the story participants, whose souls leave their bodily
shells one by one. But the director’s work is far from
the high yardstick he has demonstrated in Three Sisters (Sofia
Theatre), Quartet (Sfumato Theatrical Workshop) and Verona (The
National Theatre).
However the actors’ performance can
only make the National Army Theatre regret it voluntarily renounced
its claims to the Askeer Award. Vasil Mihailov’s Avram
Tanurkov is loaded with the experience of a man who has passed
through all the insanity of a political rule, accepted the burden
of his sin and hence forgiven the sin of his murderers. Meglena
Karalambova (Spasia) radiates with the piety of her stage character.
The actress has perfectly mastered the gestures of a tough woman
who has spent her life toiling in the fields and the black kerchief
is a bit incompatible with the otherwise childish face. There
is also a peculiar contrast between, on the one hand, the real
age and stage experience of Kristina Yaneva, one of the theatre’s
young recruits, and, on the other hand, her breathtaking performance
as Beba the Swan. Under the shaggy wig of the junky who has
always played blind man’s buff with death, in the hoarse
voice and the rough slang, in the stiff body and paralysed hand
there is not even a trace of the actress’ characteristic
temperament and verve. What we see on the stage is just the
empty shell of a creature whose spirit has died long ago. Kamen
Donev’s Zdravko is a baby-face killer who, probably unaware
of the monstrosity of his deed, just passes nonchalantly through
his short life. Deyan Donkov’s Lazar is truly resurrected,
just like the biblical prototype, from his wicked ways, but
his performance still lacks the power and rich connotations
of the final cry: “God bless my soul!” And Stefania
Koleva confers a resounding depth to the words: “I talk
nasty things and I myself become… just like the whole
sad nasty junk around…”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
CHARMING
MY FLEAS by Boyan Papazov, National Army Theatre, Director Krikor
Azaryan, Design Nikola Toromanov, Visual Design Georgi Bogdanov
and Boris Misirkov, Music Stefan Vuldobrev. Featuring: Vasil Mihailov,
Meglena Karalambova, Deyan Donkov, Kristina Yaneva, Kamen Donev,
Stefania Koleva, etc.
Charming my Fleas is Boyan Papazov's last play
and one of his best. In fact, it is one of the best Bulgarian
plays written in recent years. The language of the characters
of the social margin is rich, down-to-earth, physiological, esoteric,
hyperrealistic, image-obsessed, agile, flexible. Performative.
Playing on the scene of imagination, if read as a text. Keeping
its plentiful literary aspects, if staged. It is deeply rooted
in the archetypes of Bulgarian literature and drama. It desperately
reaches for someone out there. Someone who might listen or understand.
But where is s/he? This simple at first sight question remains
unanswered. We can detect it in some other texts by Boyan Papazov
like Nadezhda the Blind, for instance: " Words can't burn in fire.
(…) We shouldn't keep silent. Some day they'll hear us." In Charming
my Fleas this is exactly the main question, crucified on its own
dramatic intensity. In the end Tanurko's soul, looking from high
above at the people, crawling on the earth like fleas, utters
sadly: "Good Lord, nobody ever gets heard! They are charming their
fleas, just mumbling, and nobody cares what the next person is
mumbling to his fleas." The familiar echo of existentialism and
the no less familiar bitterness of "uninstructive" History are
easily recognisable in the closed circle of living and speaking,
reproduced by each member of Tanurko's family. There is also one
of the key themes of Bulgarian literature, recurring in the works
of our best writers: the intrinsic loneliness, reticence and even
hostility to the words/experience/life of the Other inside the
otherwise healthy Bulgarian patriarchal family.
Needless to say,
Boyan Papazov's text is open to different plains of reading. It
can be read even as an answer to, or interpretation of, some basic
Bulgarian drama plots, like that of Boryana by Yovkov, for instance.
Tanurko, just like the character in Boryana, is squatting dog-like
over his stolen, sinful gold, but he lacks the possibility of
hope which Yovkov opens with Boryana's entrance. Boryana, like
most of Yovkov's female personae, is a transgressive image. She
is the hope for change in the status quo, not the blind, but the
poetic hope, capable of giving birth to something new and different.
Boyan Papazov instead gets the souls of his characters on stage,
hovering there in the beyond, watching the people down whirling
like dervishes in the orbits of their lives. Thus he trusts his
hope to the still unfathomed and mysterious way of human life,
to Lazar who begets a son.
Boyan Papazov defines Charming my Fleas
as "mystic tragicomedy". Krikor Azaryan's interpretation sheds
some of the mysticism, although the visual environment and the
stage second level are supposed to add mysticism to "the theatre
of life going on down there" inside the "windows" opened for each
of the characters. I can imagine how difficult the staging of
this text is. Krikor Azaryan has found one of the most feasible,
successful and cautious approaches towards it. He has placed the
monologues of this family, broken up and scattered during the
second half of the 20th C, an ethnic mix of Bulgarians, Gypsies,
Armenians, etc., a peripheral bunch of individuals, within the
symmetry of the "talking" family tree. Unlike the play, its stage
version begins with the monologue of the Grandfather (the Father
Figure) Avram Tanurkov (Vasil Mihailov, who muffles away half
of the text) and ends with the monologue of the Grandmother (the
Mother Figure) Spasia . The director places each character in
the clear contours of his/her individuality, carrying the imprint
of experience along the road of personal biography. This approach,
on the one hand, perhaps partly infringes on the metaphysical
plane of the text, yet on the other hand succeeds in turning it
into a spectacle with real-life people, giving the actors the
rare opportunity to build vivid stage characters. This opportunity
is best "utilized" by Meglena Karalambova (Spasia), Kamen Donev
(Zarko) and Deyan Donkov (Lazar). The larger-than-life characterizing
gestures (both intonational and physical) inherently carry the
potential of "comedy". Along with it Krikor Azaryan has smuggled
in more drama than tragedy. He treats the bruised people of Boyan
Papazov with benevolence, affection and sadness. Which is some
consolation at least - not only for them, but also for all of
us, mumbling to our fleas.
|